Media groups have welcomed the life sentence handed to a French jihadi linked to the 2015 Charlie Hebdo attack.
A French court last week found Peter Cherif guilty of “belonging to a criminal organization” in connection to his work with al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula, according to AFP.
Cherif, 42, is suspected of training Chérif Kouachi, one of the people who carried out a deadly attack on staff at the French satirical magazine on Jan. 7, 2015.
“This is a very important verdict on the global level,” Pavol Szalai, of media watchdog Reporters Without Borders, or RSF, told VOA. “It shows that not only the justice for assassination of media professionals can be served, but that it can also go beyond the sentencing of the direct perpetrators.”
Szalai told VOA that Cherif was in the “middle of the chain of command” in planning the attacks.
In the trial, prosecutors called Cherif a “jihadist through and through” and a “cornerstone of planning” for the attacks.
Cherif was not charged with complicity in the Charlie Hebdo attack. Instead, prosecutors used a broader terrorism claim, according to AFP.
“I feel like I’ve taken part in a rigged match,” Nabil El Ouchikli, Cherif’s defense lawyer, was cited as saying.
The decision to sentence Cherif to life in prison was made “in view of the seriousness of the acts,” the president of the court said at the sentencing.
Eight members of Charlie Hebdo’s editorial staff, along with a former journalist visiting their office, a maintenance worker, a police officer and a police bodyguard died in the attack.
Kouachi and his brother stormed an editorial meeting and opened fire on the media outlet’s Paris office. It was the largest massacre of media professionals in France since World War II, according to Szalai.
The assailants were killed during a gunfight with police on January 9.
The 2015 attack stemmed from “religious intolerance” of journalists and Charlie Hebdo’s work, Szalai said.
Attila Mong, from the Committee to Protect Journalists, said that all perpetrators, no matter their level of involvement, should be brought to justice.
“This latest verdict sends an important message to violent extremists that they will not have the last word and their attempts to silence free speech will not prevail,” Mong told VOA in an email.
More than 1,600 journalists have been killed since 1993, according to the UNESCO observatory of killed journalists. However, only one in 10 of such cases result in a conviction.
Although Szalai called France’s verdict “good news for press freedom,” he said in most cases of slain journalists they have yet to secure justice. Many times, an intermediary is punished but those higher up in the chain of command are not, he told VOA.
He cited the case of Daphne Caruana Galizia, an anti-corruption reporter murdered seven years ago in Malta.
In that case, several people have been charged but there has yet to be a trial for the alleged mastermind.
Similarly, after the 2018 Slovakia murder of an investigative journalist and his fiancée, those who carried out the attack are in prison but the suspected mastermind has been acquitted twice. The second acquittal is still awaiting a Supreme Court appeal.
“In none of those cases has complete justice been served,” Szalai said.
